The editing of Pat Buchanan didn't represented what he said. Notably absent was his statement and position that the amnesty was for corporations who hire illegals in defiance of the law. I point this out, because activists reframe this debate ignoring important aspects of the bill that would import cheap labor to the US to the tune of 600K workers per year who must qualify based upon education and skills.
Amnesty for corporations who break the law isn't equivalent to the emotional depictions of separating families and being unfair to poor desparate people as address by immigrant activists in this debate. Can we get real facts on the questions in the immigration debate? I doubt it.
In our TPMtv Sunday Show Roundup, we bring you a grab bag of the whirlwind of topics tossed about on the Sunday morning talks shows, from Dick Cheney to Immigration to Rudy Giuliani to Iraq.
These sunday roundups are really useful. But why don't you give your own expanation as well Josh?
I think they are good as theya re -Josh lets the clips speak for themselves
The editing of Pat Buchanan didn't represented what he said. Notably absent was his statement and position that the amnesty was for corporations who hire illegals in defiance of the law. I point this out, because activists reframe this debate ignoring important aspects of the bill that would import cheap labor to the US to the tune of 600K workers per year who must qualify based upon education and skills.
Amnesty for corporations who break the law isn't equivalent to the emotional depictions of separating families and being unfair to poor desparate people as address by immigrant activists in this debate. Can we get real facts on the questions in the immigration debate? I doubt it.